Did the votes actually cast on April 14th represent the will of the Venezuelan electorate, or didn’t they?
It’s a simple question, a basic question, and one that the Capriles campaign has been unable to answer coherently.
On the one hand, we’ve had a strong emphasis on incidencias – instances of threats, intimidation, bullying, abuse of state power and downright ballot stuffing that strongly suggest that the votes that ended up in the ballot box are not a faithful representation of the electorate’s will as of April 14th. Here, Capriles’s evidence is strong, documented and compelling. Venezuela’s electoral law (Articles 217-226) provides a clear mandate to re-run elections in centers where major irregularities are proven, which is logical: if you determine that, for whatever reason, the votes cast don’t reflect the will of the voters, you better vote again.
In parallel, we’ve had a strong emphasis on an audit of the…
Ver la entrada original 545 palabras más